Expert Webinar: “Trade Based Money Laundering”

Congressman Robert Pittenger hosted the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Webinar on Trade Based Money Laundering.

This forum provides the opportunity for Members of Parliament throughout the world to learn from experts and each other about issues of national security particularly in reference to fight organized crime, money laundering and counter-terrorism efforts. These forums not only share critical information but encouraged co-operation between governments, private, and public sector organizations.

Handelsbezogene Geldwäsche “Trade Based Money Laundering”
17th-parliamentary-intelligence-security-forum-in-washington/
14th-parliamentary-intelligence-security-forum/

Other Ways Of Money Laundering!

Art World: “Panic. Absolute Bloody Panic”
Can the art world clean up its act? In the secretive art market, new anti-money laundering legislation has landed like a bomb.

Jan Dalley reports:  A senior gallerist is describing the first reaction of fellow members of the Society of London Art Dealers to new regulations to combat money laundering in the art market. I’m hardly surprised: even after 15 years of covering the art world as a journalist, I’m often amazed by its peculiar codes and customs, still substantially based on relationships, private agreements and trust.

But this old-school way of doing things, which provides a climate ripe for exploitation by the unscrupulous, is under challenge from the modern world. There has long been concern over the ease with which suspect funds can be laundered through the buying and selling of art. Now, at last, we are seeing a concerted attempt to get to grips with the issue, which — even if welcomed by most — has sparked resentment and wariness. This almost unregulated sector doesn’t take easily or kindly to attempts to legislate it. What we do not know is whether the EU initiative — the fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, which spread the net to include luxury goods, property and the art market, and which became law in the UK in January — will prove equal to a problem some have considered intractable.

The art trade seems almost ridiculously tailor-made for money laundering — because of the value of some pieces, because they are usually easily portable, and most of all because of the cult of secrecy that holds sway in the sector. There’s nothing inherently wrong with secretiveness; there can be valid and innocent reasons for it. But there’s clearly room for subterfuge. At least 50 per cent of all art transactions are entirely private and handshake deals are still common; even in the auction houses, which appear to be so public-facing, the price may be disclosed but the identities of both buyer and seller are often guarded to the grave.

Perhaps most significantly of all, there is no registration of ownership of artworks, as there is with shares or property — we don’t know for certain where even some of the most famous pictures are held, or who in fact owns them. Take Van Gogh’s “Sunflowers”, one version of which sold in 1987 for a then spectacular $39.9m to a Japanese buyer (or possibly his company): does anyone know where it is now? …..FT.com
Financial Times: @FT

ft.com

 

Josef Ackermann’s Leadership Changed The Bank In 2002

Dark Towers’ exposes chaos and corruption at the bank that holds Trump’s secrets.
Deutsche Bank was willing to work with Donald Trump when others would not. In his book, David Enrich details Deutsche Bank’s quest to become the world’s largest bank — and how its corporate culture led to countless.

Dave Davies reports: In the 1990s, long before he became president, Donald Trump was known as a cash-strapped New York City businessman with shaky credit.

“His record of defaulting on loans and stiffing his business partners was very long and very well-documented,” New York Times finance editor David Enrich says. “Any mainstream financial institution that had competent risk management systems in place — there is no way they were going to do business with Donald Trump.”

Enter Deutsche Bank, which Enrich says was a “second-tier player” in the banking world in the 1990s. Seeking to make a name for itself, the bank was willing to work with Trump when others would not.

“The bank was so hungry for profits, for short-term profits, and so hungry to make a name for itself in the United States that it was really eager to just disregard any red flags that presented themselves with clients,” Enrich says. “Trump would default on a bond offering. He would default on a loan. He would sue the bank. And yet, time after time, Deutsche Bank executives kept going back to him for more business.”

On Deutsche Bank’s concerns about Trump holding political office…
On Deutsche Bank’s ties to the Nazi regime…
On Deutsche Bank’s transformation in the 1990s…
On Deutsche Bank violating American sanctions…
On Deutsche Bank laundering money for Russian customers…
On the chaos at the Deutsche Bank office in Jacksonville, Fla., which analyzes suspicious transactions…
mprnews.org

www.paolo-calleri.de/

British Bankers On Trial In Germany Charged With €447m Fraud

UK pair accused of defrauding German state through ‘cum-ex’ share trading scheme.
Two British investment bankers have gone on trial in Bonn in what German media have called “the biggest financial fraud trial” in the country’s postwar history.

The two British citizens, Martin Shields, 41, and Nicholas Diable, 38, are accused of having defrauded the German state of €447.5m (£405m) from London’s banking district with so-called cum-ex trading schemes, a complex shell game of share transactions.

Cum-ex transactions work by trading shares at high speed on or just before the dividend record date – the day the company checks its records to identify shareholders – and then claiming two or more refunds for capital gains tax which had in fact only been paid to the state once…..theguardian.com

Cum-Ex- UK Bankers on Trial /C.Ohde

Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.”

Why Anti-Money Laundering Should Be a Top Priority for Financial Institutions

One issue that’s been in the headlines for many years is anti-money laundering (AML). When criminals are able to successfully hide the illicit origins of their cash, both the financial institution and society suffer.

Why AML Should be a Top Priority for Financial Institutions

The to-do list for any financial executive is surely daunting. From navigating technology changes to managing talent effectively, there’s many initiatives competing for attention.

One issue that’s been in the headlines for many years is anti-money laundering (AML). When criminals are able to successfully hide the illicit origins of their cash, both the financial institution and society suffer. So, what makes AML more important now than it has been in the past?

Rising up the Priority Ladder

Today’s infographic from McKinsey & Company explains the factors which have brought anti-money laundering urgently to the forefront in recent years.

1. Regulatory Action

Enforcement actions related to AML have been on the rise. Since 2009, regulators have levied approximately $32 billion in AML-related fines globally.

2. Threat Evolution
Criminals are using more sophisticated means to remain undetected, including globally-coordinated technology, insider information, and e-commerce schemes.

3. Reputational Risk

AML incidents put a financial institution’s reputation on the line. There’s a lot at stake: today, the average value of each of the top 10 bank brands is $45B.

4. Rising Costs

Most AML activities require significant manual effort, making them inefficient and difficult to scale. In 2018, it cost U.S. financial services firms about $25.3B to manage money laundering risk.

5. Poor Customer Experience

Compliance staff must have multiple touch points with a customer to gather and verify information. Perhaps not surprisingly, one in three financial institutions have lost potential customers due to inefficient or slow onboarding processes.

It’s no wonder anti-money laundering has now become a top priority for many CEOs in the financial industry.

A Wave of Innovation

In the last five years, there has been an explosion of “RegTech” startups—companies that address regulatory requirements using technology.

Jenna Ross reports:  Visualcapitalist.com

A number of factors in recent years have brought anti-money laundering to the forefront for banks and other financial institutions. In this infographic, we explore the various trends, and then look at how innovations in technology are offering new ways to address AML challenges in areas such as customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, and management oversight. In conclusion, we look at how investments in AML can create competitive advantages for financial institutions.
Why AML should be a top priority for financial institutions PDF/ Download

[click here to enlarge infographic]

How Mauritius Leaks Got Started

Mauritius Leaks is our cross-border investigation into how one law firm on a small island off Africa’s east coast helped companies leach tax revenue from poor African, Arab and Asian nations.

Led by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the investigation is a collaboration by 54 journalists in 18 countries.

More than 200,000 documents from the Mauritius office of a prestigious offshore law firm, Conyers Dill & Pearman, are at the heart of the investigation. ICIJ corroborated company information from the leaked documents with data in the Mauritius corporate registry and the Financial Services Commission’s register of licensees.

The documents offer a rare window into corporate tax avoidance in countries in Africa, the Middle East and Asia.

Read the full investigation: icij.org/investigations/mauritius-leaks

icij.org