Entrepreneurs: Leaders of the Future

One of the country’s few remaining independent media outlets, analyzed the impact of American inventor Elon Musk’s inventions on the global economy, and on Russia in particular. She specifically singled out Musk’s recently unveiled solar battery:

Yulia Latinina of Novaya Gazeta writes:  First, car exhaust is really poisonous of the environment.  Second, his battery ensures that the house can be truly autonomous – after the invention of electricity, the house seized being an independent entity throughout the world. And third, this battery will change the world as much as shale gas could, and much more than the results of any election and any revolution.

Latinina feels that Musk’s breakthrough – along with other creations such as the hyperloop – will shift power away from presidencies and official heads of state, and move us toward a world where entrepreneurs have bigger sway and greater influence on international affairs. She is clearly impressed with the influence America’s top high-tech companies have, both at home and around the world. While she may overstate that influence, she importantly laments the absence of like initiatives in Russia, where major inventors and entrepreneurs must toe the government line:

President Putin is seriously waiting for the United States to finally come to its senses and to sit down to negotiate with him, as with Joseph Stalin at Yalta in 1945 and divide the world into spheres of influence … The problem is that the ‘zone of influence’ of the United States in the modern world is not established by Barack Obama, but by Sergey Brin, Elon Musk, and Steve Jobs. But since Putin’s policy is not to allow a Musk or a Jobs in Russia  – since every independent entrepreneur is a potential threat to the authorities –  the underlying principle for such negations practically does not exit.

Entrepreneur Alert: How Lobbying Helps

Karen Weize writes: Over the past year, Uber built one of the largest and most successful lobbying forces in the country, with a presence in almost every statehouse. It has 250 lobbyists and 29 lobbying firms registered in capitols around the nation, at least a third more than Wal-Mart Stores. That doesn’t count municipal lobbyists. In Portland, the 28th-largest city in the U.S., 10 people would ultimately register to lobby on Uber’s behalf. They’d become a constant force in City Hall. City officials say they’d never seen anything on this scale.

If you’re starting up a business that fits into a large niche, you might well consider joining forces with your allies and competitors to influence City Hall.

Effective Lobbying

Greece Shutters Banks for Six Days

Greek leaders planned to shutter their banks for six business days starting Monday and impose strict limits on ATM withdrawals amid rising global concerns about the nation’s economic future.

Sunday’s decision to declare a bank holiday was a signal that Greece’s five-year battle to stay in the shared euro currency may swiftly be coming to an end, as leaders elsewhere urged steps to find a way to avoid that. Panicked citizens tried to pull their money from their accounts while they still could. ATMs in Athens were running out of money, and tensions were running high as Greeks stood in line for hours to scrape together cash for basic supplies. Lines mounted at gas stations as worried residents topped off their tanks for what could be a protracted period of time in a cashless nation.

“The decision not to prolong financial aid to Greece is offensive, and it’s a disgrace for Europe in general,” Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said in a brief Sunday evening address broadcast across Greek television networks. He said he was seeking an extended and enlarged bailout from European lenders that would carry the country past Tuesday, when it will otherwise face default.

There were signs that Greece’s creditors — the International Monetary Fund and euro-zone governments — were leaving the door open to negotiations. But it remained unclear ahead of Tuesday’s IMF repayment deadline how Greece would be able to satisfactorily arrange its finances.

Tsipras said that the threat by European Union leaders to hold Greece to the deadline and not extend further assistance amounts to “blackmail.” But he gave no concrete indications that he had made any concessions that would change their minds.

Greek Crisis Calendar

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/8b960548-143b-11e5-9bc5-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz3eLevbuxS

June 29: Recalling the Bundestag

The primary reason a deal must be concluded by June 25 is so there is enough time for eurozone parliaments to approve an extension of the existing bailout programme.

Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the Dutch finance minister who heads the negotiations for his 17 eurozone counterparts, has said there is simply no longer time for Greece to legislate and pass all the “prior actions” needed to win bailout money before the rescue programme runs out at the end of the month. So it will have to be extended for a third time in seven months.

Under national laws, any extension must be approved by a handful of eurozone parliaments — most importantly the German Bundestag, which is due to be on recess next week. Although the centre-right bloc of Chancellor Angela Merkel has become increasingly restless over Greece, they are likely to back any extension she endorses — even if they have to return from holiday to do so. But the vote must be held either the 29th or 30th, giving legislators precious little time to review the agreement.

June 30: Expiration date

The date Greece’s bailout expires and when it is due to repay €1.5bn in loan repayments to the International Monetary Fund. Even if a deal is in place before the deadline expires, it remains unclear how — or whether — Greece will find the money to pay the IMF, since there is not enough time for Athens to pass all the economic reforms necessary to gain access to any of the €7.2bn in bailout funds.

One option to quickly raise funds would be for the ECB to lift its existing cap on the amount of short-term debt the Greek government can issue by about €2bn. This would enable Athens to quickly raise cash to make the IMF payment.

The ECB imposed the cap in February because of signs Greek banks were the only buyers of such Treasury bills. Because Greek banks are only staying open through ECB-approved emergency loans, increasing the t-bill cap would essentially mean central bank money was being used to fund the Greek state — a violation of EU law.

But the ECB could decide that an agreement on a new economic reform plan means that new money, in the form of bailout aid, is on its way to Athens, meaning T-bill sales to Greek banks are not directly funding government operations. That would allow them to raise the cap.

It is also possible Athens just misses the payment. Although technically this is not a default, since IMF rules consider a non-payment “arrears”, Greece would join a motley crew of developing countries — Somalia, Cuba and Zimbabwe — that have current or former “overdue obligations” to the IMF.

But credit rating agencies have said that non-payment to the IMF is not formally a default, and the ECB is unlikely to decide it means Greece is bankrupt. If it did, much of the collateral used by Greek banks to obtain their emergency loans — particularly Greek government bonds — would be worthless. That would mean the ECB having to cut off emergency funding, probably forcing a Grexit.

July 1: The extended bailout

If a deal is reached and all the legislative approvals are voted in time, Greece’s bailout would be extended for anywhere from three to nine months. For the EU’s portion of the bailout, the extension is expected to include a bit more money as well.

Of the €7.2bn in the current bailout tranche, the eurozone is due to contribute about half (the other half would come from the IMF). On top of that, €10.9bn in rescue funds that had been set aside to recapitalise Greece’s banks remains unused and eurozone leaders are likely to approve a “repurposing” of those funds as general bailout aid.

In addition, another €1.5bn in profits on Greek bonds held by the ECB — which are to be refunded to Athens as part of a deal reached three years ago — come online July 1. All told, that’s about €16bn in EU aid available to Athens as part of the extension. The length of the extension will depend largely on how long officials determine that money can last.

There is also about €16.4bn remaining in the IMF’s portion of the bailout, which runs through March 2016.

July 20: Drop-dead deadline

This may be the real drop-dead deadline: the date two bonds totalling €3.5bn fall due to the ECB.

Although credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s said recently it would not consider a failure to pay these bonds a full default — it said only non-payment on bonds held by private creditors constitutes a default in their books — it would be virtually impossible for Greece to survive inside the eurozone if it defaulted on the ECB.

That means Greece must legislate for and implement the entire reform programme before this date so that it ensures it has bailout funding in time to repay the ECB. Another €3.2bn is due for two more bonds held by the ECB on August 20.

Courtesy Financial Times

Greece: End of the Month Accounting

IThe current extension of the Greek bailout money expires on June 30th.  If the extension is not granted, Grece will have to rely on tax money to. Operate.   Greece has a lot of trouble collecting taxes.

Also, if the bailout monies are not extended, Grece will be unable to pay ht emoney it owed the IMF.

Although Greece has always had trouble filling the public coffers, they have in the past made their IMF payments.   This would be the first time they have failed to pay.    It might kick off a series of actions leading to their exodus from the euro zone and ultimately the EU .

Dark Side of Goldman Sachs Gets Darker

When sanctions against Libya were lifted, Goldman Sachs among others rushed in to take advanatage of the40 billion dollar investment opportunity offered by Libyan Investmnent Authority.

Now there is a court case in London which reveals that in exchange for $350 billion in fees, Goldman lost about a billion dollars of its cients’ dolllars.

Goldman claims this is a is not true.  The Libyan Invesmtment Authority pleas financial illieracy

A high court judge has ordered Goldman Sachs to reveal how much profit it made on a deal that lost Libya’s government more than $1bn when financial bets turned sour.

The Libyan Investment Authority, created in 2006 to look after the country’s oil riches, accused the Wall Street bank of duping it into making investments that its “naive” staff didn’t understand.

A judge in the high court’s chancery division ordered the US investment bank to disclose how much money it had made on the deal. She asked Goldman to provide documents showing its profits on the disputed trades and how they were calculated.

Roger Masefield QC, acting for the Libyan investment fund, told the court that Goldman Sachs had made “substantial and unusually high” profits on the deal.

The dispute centres on nine financial products the Libyan sovereign wealth fund bought from Goldman Sachs in early 2008. These derivative investments were essentially bets on the future share price of a host of western companies, such as financial firm Citigroup and the energy group EDF.

The Libyan fund said it thought it was buying shares in the companies and alleges Goldman Sachs showered gifts on “naive” staff to induce them to buy products they didn’t understand. But Goldman argues the trades were not difficult for the fund’s “financially sophisticated” senior bankers to understand and has dismissed the claim as “a paradigm of buyer’s remorse”.

The case is proving to be an unwelcome spotlight on the workings of a Wall Street bank that prefers to keep a low profile.

The legal action against Goldman Sachs was launched in January, in the wake of new management being brought in at the sovereign wealth fund after the 2011 civil war, when Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi was toppled from power and killed.

As the loss-making deals of the Gaddafi era have come under the microscope, the fund has launched separate legal action against France’s third-largest bank, Société Générale, alleging bribery. It has rebutted the claims as without merit.

Goldman Sachs and Libya

 

 

 

Greece in Sum

In Greece we are looking at a variety of fundamental issues.   First of all, the taxation system is difficult to implement.  Value Added Taxes vary enormously depending on political connections.  They can range from almost nothing to 23 per cent.  High or low, they’re difficult tto collect.

The pension system is also unduly complicated and Ned’s to be sinplieiied so that appropriate policies can be put in place.

Privitization of businesses was supposed to yield the government more than 30 billion euros.  To date, it has brought in somewhere between 2 and 3 billion.

The problem is not so much a lack of willingness on the part of theGreek government as a lack of understanding of what can be done.

Gareece inability to grapple successfully with the economy for five years makes lenders wary.

Greece?

 

Reform Terrain in India

International optimism sparked by the election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be tempered by the fact that reforms he has promised face “challenges [that] have deep-rooted origins with no easy solutions“.  With many of India’s institutional traditions deriving from its colonial past many are short-term focused and disconcerting for Indians to modify due to the increase of uncertainty that accompanies the process.  The author, Sudarshan Murthy of Matthews Asia, provides a diagram summarizing his view of the reform terrain:

india.reforms

Co-ethnic Networks Work!

RIcardo Hausmann writes: Many countries have substantial diasporas, but not many are proud of it. After all, people tend not to leave a country when it is doing well, so the diaspora is often a reminder of a country’s darker moments.

El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Cuba, to cite three examples, had more than 10% of their native population living abroad in 2010. And this figure does not take into account their descendants. The bulk of this migration happened at a time of civil war or revolution. In other places, massive outmigration occurred in the context of political change, as in Europe when communism collapsed.

The relationship between diasporas and their homelands often encompasses a broad palette of sentiments, including distrust, resentment, envy, and enmity.

One important connection is remittances, which add up to some $500 billion a year worldwide. The largest recipients are India, Mexico, and the Philippines. For countries such as Armenia, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho, Moldova, Nepal, and Tajikistan, expatriates remit the equivalent of more than one-sixth of national income – an amount that often exceeds exports.

From the beginning of urban life, millennia ago, trade typically involved networks of co-ethnic merchants living among aliens. Greeks, Phoenicians, trans-Saharan traders, the Hanseatic League, Jews, Armenians, overseas Chinese, and the Dutch and British East India Companies organized much of world trade through such networks.

Co-ethnic networks’ durability and resilience throughout history reflects their ability to enforce contracts at long distances when the existing institutional framework could not do so reliably. They could establish trust between exporters and importers because they could punish opportunistic behaviors. For a tight-knit community, reputational costs and other forms of social punishment transcend geography: not paying for goods might mean not being able to marry your children well.

Legal institutions have since evolved to facilitate impersonal trade. Exporters and importers no longer need to know one another, because they can write a contract that a court will enforce.

This knowhow moves geographically in the brains of those who possess it and is transferred to others at work. That is why ethnic cuisines diffuse through diasporas, not cookbooks. And it may be why economies with more diverse sets of migrants perform better. Also, return migration is often an important source of new skills for a country.

Evidence of the importance of diasporas is everywhere, if you care to look. Franschhoek (French corner in Afrikaans) is a beautiful valley near Cape Town settled by Huguenots in the late seventeenth century. That is why, to this day, wines are made there.

Likewise, Joinville is a southern Brazilian city settled in the late nineteenth century by relatively uneducated Germans. Because of the cultural links they and their descendants have maintained with the mother country for more than 120 years, the city excels at advanced manufacturing of products that had not been invented when the migrants came. Morocco is full of French-language call centers that get their contracts through a cousin in Paris.

A country’s diaspora, and the diasporas it hosts, can be a huge asset for its development. Diasporas are not gusanos or worms, as Fidel Castro refers to Cubans abroad. They are a potential source of opportunities for trade, investment, innovation, and professional networks.

But a diaspora can work its economic magic only if the host country tolerates it and the home country appreciates it.

 Diaspora Works!

Lagarde Asks for Credible Reform and Second Term

Greece must present credible reform plans and they cannot be built only on promises of more tax revenues, International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde said in an interview published by French magazine Challenges on Wednesday.

Lagarde said a Greek economic recovery would require not only Greek reforms but also steps by European creditors to make Greece’s debt sustainable.

However she said the Greek plan had to be credible.

“You can’t build a programme just on the promise of improved tax collection, as we have heard for the past five years with very little result,” she told the magazine.

Lagarde said she did not want Greece to leave the euro zone and did not believe in any eurozone explosion.

Eurozone Explosion?