Italian Mafia Benefits from Immigration Crisis

James Politi writes: In one intercepted phone call released by Italian police last year, Salvatore Buzzi, a leftwing social activist who served time in jail for murder in the 1980s, remarked: “Do you have any idea how much I earn on immigrants? Drugs are less profitable.”

Mr Buzzi, who was arrested, denies any wrongdoing. This week brought a grim reminder of the human toll of the refugee crisis, after as many as 40 people drowned about 30 miles off the north African coast when their inflatable dinghy flooded. Those who reach land safely face huge obstacles to rebuild their lives in Europe. Criminal involvement in their lodging and care has only darkened their plight since it can often lead to reduced services for the refugees. It has also provided fodder for anti­immigrant groups seeking to block any form of public assistance to the new arrivals. “We must stop the departures and the landings, and block all the contracts,” Matteo Salvini, leader of the anti­immigrant Northern League, wrote last month on Facebook. According to Italian officials, the criminal enterprise that has come to dominate the business of lodging asylum seekers is a group based in Rome — known as Mafia Capitale — that has made public corruption one of its main sources of revenue.

The Roman organisation was unearthed by Italian prosecutors last December. Its top brass allegedly colluded with local politicians and government officials to have the migrant centres run by “cooperatives”, or charity groups, that could serve their interests. Mr Buzzi is alleged to have had close ties to such groups. Giovanni Salvi, the former chief prosecutor of Catania, in Sicily, the first Italian destination for many migrants, says organised crime gained a foothold in the migrant business because the flood of arrivals — some 170,000 people last year and as many expected this year — have left public officials scrambling each day to find accommodations, often with little oversight. But Mr Salvi, who became prosecutor­general of Rome this month, says the “new element that shook the Italian political tissue and public opinion” was that some NGOs were involved in the “exploitation”.

It emerged that this network was simply a way of making money.” Ignazio Marino, the mayor of Rome, this week highlighted the criminal infiltration at a Vatican event on climate change and slavery attended by many of his counterparts from around the world. “We’re working to restore legality and transparency. In recent years corrupt politicians and officials have taken advantage of the migration crisis.

Immigration to EU

 

Only Goldman Understands Accounting?

Robert Reich writes: The Greek debt crisis offers another illustration of Wall Street’s powers of persuasion and predation, although the Street is missing from most accounts.

The crisis was exacerbated years ago by a deal with Goldman Sachs, engineered by Goldman’s current CEO, Lloyd Blankfein.

Blankfein and his Goldman team helped Greece hide the true extent of its debt, and in the process almost doubled it. In 2001, Greece was looking for ways to disguise its mounting financial troubles. The Maastricht Treaty required all eurozone member states to show improvement in their public finances, but Greece was heading in the wrong direction.

Then Goldman Sachs came to the rescue, arranging a secret loan of 2.8 billion euros for Greece, disguised as an off-the-books “cross-currency swap”—a complicated transaction in which Greece’s foreign-currency debt was converted into a domestic-currency obligation using a fictitious market exchange rate.

As a result, about 2 percent of Greece’s debt magically disappeared from its national accounts. For its services, Goldman received a whopping 600 million euros ($793 million).  That came to about 12 percent of Goldman’s revenue from its giant trading and principal-investments unit in 2001—which posted record sales that year. The unit was run by Blankfein (who set up Hillary Clinton’s son-in-law in business).

In 2005, the deal was restructured and that 5.1 billion euros in debt locked in. Perhaps not incidentally, Mario Draghi, now head of the European Central Bank and a major player in the current Greek drama, was then managing director of Goldman’s international division.

Greece wasn’t the only sinner. Until 2008, European Union accounting rules allowed member nations to manage their debt with so-called off-market rates in swaps, pushed by Goldman and other Wall Street banks. In the late 1990s, JPMorgan enabled Italy to hide its debt by swapping currency at a favorable exchange rate, thereby committing Italy to future payments that didn’t appear on its national accounts as future liabilities.

But Greece was in the worst shape, and Goldman was the biggest enabler.

Meanwhile, the people of Greece struggle to buy medicine and food.

There are analogies here in America, beginning with the predatory loans made by Goldman, other big banks, and the financial companies they were allied with in the years leading up to the bust. Today, even as the bankers vacation in the Hamptons, millions of Americans continue to struggle with the aftershock of the financial crisis in terms of lost jobs, savings, and homes.

Goldman knows very well what it is doing. It knew more about the real risks and costs of the deals it proposed than those who accepted them. “It is an issue of morality,” said the shareholder at the Goldman meeting.

Blankfein

 

Does Japan Need Shock Therapy?

Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda fails to get much traction in his bid to revitalize his country’s economy.

Former Bank Governor Shirakawa always claimed the causes of Japan’s deflation were a rigid economy and bad demographics, not a lack of money supply. Kuroda has yet to concede the point explicitly, but his bank’s actions essentially do.  BOJ officials have started issuing tacit admissions that Kuroda’s efforts at monetary stimulus have failed.

To be sure, sustained inflation would give the Prime Minister major bragging rights, and vindicate his decision to axe Shirakawa and take a more aggressive tack to end Japan’s lost-decade ordeal.

India’s credibility is still taking hits from its abrupt recalculation of the country’s 2014 gross domestic product, from 4.7 percent  to 6.9 percent. At the time, one analyst fumed that officials were “smashing India’s credibility and making its statistics bureau a laughing stock in global financial circles.”

BOJ officials argue that “the price stability target and the quantitative and qualitative monetary easing, introduced by the Bank in 2013, contributed to strengthening the anchor of inflation expectations.” Too bad the neither data nor bond rates jibe with that view. Yields on 10-year government debt are currently around 0.43 percent, lower than 0.54 percent 12 months ago. If anything, the inverse of what the BOJ is arguing is true.

Meanwhile, the BOJ’s lobbying efforts to tweak official statistics are starting to fall flat.

The truth is, Kuroda’s team has gotten as far as it can with its two huge monetary infusions since April 2013. In addition to buying about $700 billion of government debt annually, the BOJ is also pumping money into everything from asset-backed securities to exchange-traded funds. The results can be seen in the 56 percent rally in the Nikkei, but not in the areas needed to generate a sustainable recovery like sizeable wages gain or capital investments by huge companies.

That has the BOJ resorting to cheerleading. Kuroda’s team continues to churn out report after report insisting reflation efforts are working. The common theme (including last week’s report by Kamada) is that the BOJ’s moves are lifting trend inflation, stimulating the economy and loosening financial conditions. Yet the International Monetary Fund seems to have missed the memo. It just downgraded its forecast for Japanese growth this year to a 0.8 percent from a prediction of 1 percent in April.

If Kuroda wants to motivate any audience it should be Abe’s cabinet. As BOJ governors past warned, ending deflation requires much more than printing yen — or moving the data goalposts. Aside the devaluation of the yen and modest efforts to improve corporate governance, the government has done little to remake the economy. Plans to encourage startups, loosen labor markets, cut red tape and better utilize the female workforce remain largely on the drawing board. Kuroda’s monetary bonanza was meant to pave the way for structural shock-therapy that has yet to materialize. Kuroda should know that applauding the government’s failures won’t do much to restore his credibility.

 

Efforts to End Elephant Poaching

Proceeds from poaching have become a fcator in financing terrorism.  Defense departments,anti-terrorism departments and enforcement institutions are now working to prosecute poachers and end this trade.

1. Big Business
Wildlife hunting is big business – a recent 2013 estimate valued the illegal poaching trade in Africa as being worth $17 billion dollars a year and growing.

2. Big WeaponsThe most common poaching gun in east Africa is the AK47. Increasingly poachers spot elephant herds from helicopter and target their prey from above. On-the-ground poachers have been known to use machetes, spears and watermelons spiked with cyanide.

3. Big Profits
According to gun policy officials the going rate for a rifle in Kenya is around $100-120 – a fortune by local economic standards but a mere fraction of the money that can be made from just one elephant (a single tusk can be worth up to $240).

4. Chinese Prices
In China such a tusk would sell for more than $2000 – its value therefore increasing tenfold by the time it is shipped out of Africa and arrives in Asia.

5. Local Misunderstanding
A recent study found that less than a third of Chinese people surveyed knew that elephants are killed for their tusks.

6. Common mythology
A separate study showed 70 per cent think they grow back like fingernails. Another myth propagated is that elephants’ tusks fall out naturally.

7. 104 Deaths a Day
Animal rights groups estimate that poachers in Africa kill between 25,000 and 35,000 elephants annually – meaning about 104 die a day.

8. An Offence Without Prosecution
Of the 157 poaching-related cases detected in Kenya in the past three years, less than five per cent have been prosecuted and only three of those convicted were sentenced to jail.

9. Pulverizing the Trade
The Obama administration destroyed the US reserve of elephant tusks on November 5, 2013 – announcing that the pulverizing of 6 tons (5.4 tonnes) of ‘blood ivory’ would send out the right message to the world.

10. Not Far from Human
Elephants are more like us than you may know. They can be gay, left-handed, have the ability to grieve and – true to reputation – have amazing memories.

Illegal Poaching

Is Cheating Endemic in India?

Even by Indian standards, the ongoing Vyapan corruption scandal is simply staggering for what it says about the gaps in systemic coherence, safeguards – and yes, the way the country still conducts examinations. The alleged scam, which is said to have run for years in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, revolves around a massive scheme to manipulate the results of entrance examinations for medical colleges and government jobs. Every job one can think of – doctor, dentist, vet, forest ranger – is said to have been up for grabs. Police say that for at least eight years, tens of thousands of students and job aspirants paid hefty bribes to rig test results.

Nearly 2,000 people have been arrested so far, hundreds of medical students are in prison, as are several bureaucrats. Even the state’s governor is implicated. What’s more, many witnesses and alleged participants have been dying under “mysterious circumstances”, most recently a TV reporter who was investigating those deaths. One Indian news portal has described the scandal as one of the most complex to affect public life and one that “is fast acquiring the shades of a macabre crime thriller”.

Several corruption scandals have rocked Asia’s third-largest economy in the past decade but the alleged scam in Madhya Pradesh says something larger. It focuses attention on India’s outmoded exam system – a process that interrogates mostly rote learning and all at one go, rather than grading after a series of aptitude and ability tests whose results cannot be bought (or faked) however hard anyone tries. Though cheating in examinations is commonplace in India, what’s different about the alleged racket in Madhya Pradesh is its sophistication – different methods were used, including fake identity cards for people who impersonated examinees and crooked testing board officials inflated scores. This is low-level graft, yes, but the stakes are high.

It was once said that two intertwining strands run through Indian history: the incredible potential of the place and the betrayal of that potential, for example, by corruption.

Exams in India?

US Tired of SameOldSameOld?

Goldman Wins Round Against Libya

Sarah Townsend writes:The Libyan Investment Authority has failed in an attempt to sue struggling British real estate mogul Glenn Maud for more than £20 million ($31 million), but it has been granted permission to appeal the court’s decision.

The UK bankruptcy court ruled last month that Maud – who amassed a $7 billion global property portfolio before he went bust as a result of the financial crash – does not have to repay a loan he received from the LIA to help finance his acquisition of 50 percent of Banco Santander’s global headquarters in Madrid in 2008.

The loan was granted to Maud before the imposition of United Nations sanctions against Libya in March 2011.

The sanctions regime effectively prevents the turbulent North African country from seeking to recover unpaid debt, and freezes all assets held outside the state.

Although the judge did not dispute that Maud owed the money, she ruled that its repayment to Libya would amount to a breach of sanctions.

According to court documents seen by Arabian Business, Maud’s now defunct real estate company Propinvest received the first tranche of what was originally intended to be a bigger loan from Libya at a time when it was common for the country to seek inward investment from other nations.

This payment amounted to £17.6 million. Maud claimed he did not receive the rest of the agreed loan because of the collapse of the Libyan regime. The total size of that loan is not revealed in the court documents.

The documents state that Propinvest defaulted on the loan repayment from March 2010 (it went into administration in 2011). The unpaid debt stood at around £20 million including interest.

The LIA served a statutory demand on Maud but he challenged it on the grounds that to pay would amount to a breach of sanctions.

The court ruled in Maud’s favour, deciding that anyone making payment to the LIA in breach of the sanctions would be subject to criminal penalties and it would be unjust to require a debtor to make repayments in such circumstances.

The LIA had argued Maud should have applied for a licence from the UK Treasury that might have allowed him to make the repayment regardless of the sanctions.

But the court held that Maud, as a debtor, was not responsible for doing this – especially since there was no certainty that a licence would be granted.

The lawyers involved in the case declined to comment. The judgment is a coup for Maud, who retains his 50 percent stake in Banco Santander’s headquarters at a time when he is still recovering from the financial crash that caused Propinvest to collapse in 2011.

The Financial Times reported in 2012 that Maud was subject to a Channel Islands court order that prevented him from living on more than £500 ($782) a week. He also had his worldwide assets frozen.

However, the flipside of the decision is that the LIA stands to lose out on valuable sources of funding that could help it to rebuild the country.

A spokesperson for the LIA revealed that the LIA has been given leave to appeal the decision. The spokesperson said: “This was a highly technical and complex public law case concerning the interpretation of economic sanctions. The sanctions are there to protect the interest of the Libyan people.

“Rather oddly in this ruling, the existence of sanctions has been turned on its head for the benefit of a debtor who is liable to those very same people. This cannot be right.  The [LIA’s] Board of Directors is intent on clarifying this point of law and pursuing a substantial and undisputed debt due to the people of Libya.

“The LIA is taking the case to the Court of Appeal and hopes this court will recognise that Maud is seeking to protect his own interests by using a sanctions regime designed to protect funds designated for investment in the building of a safe country with a vibrant, well-educated and healthy population.”

The outcome will have implications for Libya’s other creditors – among them the banks Goldman Sachs and Société Générale, both of whom are embroiled in similar, separate, court cases to quash the LIA’s demands to pay outstanding funds.

One well placed lawyer told Arabian Business that, should the LIA win or the sanctions be lifted, questions will arise over where to direct repayments given that it is unclear which of Libya’s two warring governments are in charge of the investment body.

Surprise- Goldman Prevails

 

Dark Side of Goldman Sachs Gets Darker

When sanctions against Libya were lifted, Goldman Sachs among others rushed in to take advanatage of the40 billion dollar investment opportunity offered by Libyan Investmnent Authority.

Now there is a court case in London which reveals that in exchange for $350 billion in fees, Goldman lost about a billion dollars of its cients’ dolllars.

Goldman claims this is a is not true.  The Libyan Invesmtment Authority pleas financial illieracy

A high court judge has ordered Goldman Sachs to reveal how much profit it made on a deal that lost Libya’s government more than $1bn when financial bets turned sour.

The Libyan Investment Authority, created in 2006 to look after the country’s oil riches, accused the Wall Street bank of duping it into making investments that its “naive” staff didn’t understand.

A judge in the high court’s chancery division ordered the US investment bank to disclose how much money it had made on the deal. She asked Goldman to provide documents showing its profits on the disputed trades and how they were calculated.

Roger Masefield QC, acting for the Libyan investment fund, told the court that Goldman Sachs had made “substantial and unusually high” profits on the deal.

The dispute centres on nine financial products the Libyan sovereign wealth fund bought from Goldman Sachs in early 2008. These derivative investments were essentially bets on the future share price of a host of western companies, such as financial firm Citigroup and the energy group EDF.

The Libyan fund said it thought it was buying shares in the companies and alleges Goldman Sachs showered gifts on “naive” staff to induce them to buy products they didn’t understand. But Goldman argues the trades were not difficult for the fund’s “financially sophisticated” senior bankers to understand and has dismissed the claim as “a paradigm of buyer’s remorse”.

The case is proving to be an unwelcome spotlight on the workings of a Wall Street bank that prefers to keep a low profile.

The legal action against Goldman Sachs was launched in January, in the wake of new management being brought in at the sovereign wealth fund after the 2011 civil war, when Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi was toppled from power and killed.

As the loss-making deals of the Gaddafi era have come under the microscope, the fund has launched separate legal action against France’s third-largest bank, Société Générale, alleging bribery. It has rebutted the claims as without merit.

Goldman Sachs and Libya

 

 

 

Tackling Corruption in Romania

Romania and Bulgaria rank as the most corrupt countries in the European Union. On the birght side,the National Antit-Corruption Directorate in Romania arrested officials in 2014.

In June, the Primat Miinister Victor Ponta was charged with forgery and conflict of interest. This step may be a Catch 22, because it could force his Social Democratic Party to stay away from passing anti-corruption laws in order to keep him out of prison.

Ponta is reported to have received unaccounted consulting fees and forged documents.  It is relatiively small peanuts compared to other corrupt operatives in Romania.  Even if it turns out to be a bad move, it certainly draws attention to the problem of corruption in the country.

Corruption and the Ballot Box

 

Consistency in US Sanctions?

Julian Pecquet writes:  The State Department (State) is three years late in slapping certain sanctions on Iran, prompting new allegations that the Barack Obama administration is deliberately skirting US law in its quest for a nuclear deal.
Under the Iran, North Korea and Syria Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA), State is supposed to inform Congress every six months of attempts to help the three countries obtain weapons of mass destruction and certain missile technology. The law requires the agency to sanction violators or justify its decision not to.
But the department has fallen way behind in recent years.  Delays have kept on getting longer, with Congress receiving an update on violations committed in 2011 only in December 2014.

The State Department acknowledges the delays but faults a complex web of agency reviews to make sure allegations of violations are substantiated. Republicans, however, are jumping on the report as further evidence of the Obama administration bending over backwards to placate Tehran.

The GAO report is but the latest example of questionable sanctions enforcement that has raised congressional ire in recent months. A panel of experts for the UN’s Iran sanctions committee said that member states have not been reporting international sanctions violations by Iran. That’s despite widespread evidence of continued arms shipments to Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen in addition to Hezbollah and Hamas.
.
The US ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, disputed that account in testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on June 16.

“There’s a direct correlation between this administration not wanting to sanction anyone or any violation and their lack of reporting on those violations,” she said. “And it’s sending a signal to the international community that the United States is not serious about any of our sanctions, that if you talk to the right folks at certain agencies and get a pass.”

Effective Sanctions?