Luxembourg, a Tax Haven

Center for Public Integrity reports on the magical land of Luxembourg which has become a tax haven for large corporations.

  • Pepsi, IKEA, AIG, Coach, Deutsche Bank, Abbott Laboratories and nearly 340 other companies have secured secret deals from Luxembourg that allowed many of them to slash their global tax bills.
  • Advisors have helped multinational companies obtain at least 548 tax rulings in Luxembourg from 2002 to 2010. These legal secret deals feature complex financial structures designed to create drastic tax reductions. The rulings provide written assurance that companies’ tax-saving plans will be viewed favorably by Luxembourg authorities.
  • Companies have channeled hundreds of billions of dollars through Luxembourg and saved billions of dollars in taxes. Some firms have enjoyed effective tax rates of less than 1 percent on the profits they’ve shuffled into Luxembourg.
  • Many of the tax deals exploited international tax mismatches that allowed companies to avoid taxes both in Luxembourg and elsewhere through the use of so-called hybrid loans.
  • In many cases Luxembourg subsidiaries handling hundreds of millions of dollars in business maintain little presence and conduct little economic activity in Luxembourg. One popular address – 5, rue Guillaume Kroll – is home to more than 1,600 companies.

Magical Kingdom of Luxembourg

The “Living Will” Provision of Dodd Frank

Is this a solution to ‘too big to fail?”

Jeffrey M. Lacker, had of the Federal Reserve of Richmond, spoke on ‘too big to fail’

Here are his main points:

  • “Too big to fail” results from two mutually reinforcing conditions: Investors feel protected by an implicit commitment of government support, and policymakers feel compelled to provide that support to avoid a disruptive adjustment of expectations.
  • The origins of too big to fail can be traced back to the introduction of federal deposit insurance in 1933. The problem was exacerbated by a series of rescues by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC that began in the 1970s, and by policymakers’ actions during the financial crisis of 2007–08.
  • The Orderly Liquidation Authority created by the Dodd-Frank Act retains many of the flaws of ad-hoc pre-crisis practices and does little to improve creditors’ incentives to monitor risk-taking.
  • A better strategy for ending too big to fail is the provision in the Dodd-Frank Act requiring large financial firms to prepare “living wills” detailing how they could be resolved under the Bankruptcy Code.
  • Resolution planning is difficult work, but living wills must be credible in order for policymakers to commit to using them rather than relying on government backstops.

Living Wills?

Israel Arrests 14 for Tax Evasion

Steven Scheer writes:   Israel arrested 14 people, including a senior UBS investment adviser, as part of an investigation into Israelis allegedly holding undisclosed bank accounts with UBS worth hundreds of millions of euros, the Tax Authority said on Wednesday.  All 14 had been released on bail soon after their arrests.
In addition to the unnamed senior investment adviser at UBS who was arrested in June in Tel Aviv, 12 Israelis with accounts at UBS had also been arrested, including two suspects who own a chain of health clinics abroad, said the tax authority. An accountant for the clinics was also arrested.  An Israeli court allowed publication of the arrests and allegations following a petition by an Israeli newspaper. The court is considering whether to release the names of those arrested.
Israel is starting to crack down on foreign bank accounts held by its citizens after a similar move by the United States to track accounts held by Americans abroad.  The tax authority said it had carried out a long investigation into accounts held by Israelis in Swiss banks and received information that thousands of Israelis maintain accounts in Switzerland, worth hundreds of millions of euros.

The authority said that the UBS adviser had arrived in Israel the day before he was arrested. He had met Israeli clients at a luxury hotel in Tel Aviv the following day.
“The meetings were held under secret surveillance of tax authority investigators,” it said. “At the end of the meeting …all the participants were arrested.”
Searches were subsequently made in the hotel room of the UBS adviser, UBS’s office in Israel and in other locations.  Among the adviser’s possessions, investigators found lists of hundreds of Israelis with unreported bank accounts in Switzerland, the authority said, adding that he is accused of helping clients intentionally and deliberately avoid reporting and paying taxes.
It said the adviser — directly responsible for dealing with the accounts — would visit Israel for secret meetings with clients who did not want to send instructions and documents to the bank by phone, mail or fax to avoid revealing that they held Swiss bank accounts.
Leumi, Israel’s second largest bank, last week said a settlement with U.S. authorities over possible tax evasion by the bank’s American clients could be far higher than previously estimated.
The total penalty could reach as much as $600 million, based on Leumi’s previous estimate as well as a settlement offer from New York State’s financial regulator.

Arrests

European Banks Fail Stress Test?

David Shilpley writes:  The European Central Bank has just published the results of new “stress tests” on European Union banks, hoping to convince financial markets that the banking system is now strong enough to weather another crisis. This latest exercise is a big improvement over previous efforts, which were widely derided as too soft — but it’s still not good enough.

The test was in two parts.  One found that most of the over 130 banks had overvalued their assets.  The second part assessed whether the correct value of the assets kept the banks in a safety zone.  25 failed the test.  8 needed to raise 6.4 billion dollars.

Deutsche Bank raised 8.5 billion in equity this year to help them pass the stress test. Weak institutions, such as Portugal’s Banco Espirito Santo and Austria’s Volksbanken network, are restructuring or shutting down. By strengthening the system and increasing confidence in it, the ECB’s tests might reverse a two-year slump in private-sector lending.

The tests are pretty soft. Economists at Switzerland’s Center for Risk Management at Lausanne put the capital shortfall at 500 billion euros, not the 6.8 billiioin put forward by the ECB.  Of course, the ECB takes over as the euro areas’s supernational bank supervisor on November 4.  If it had been too tough it might have blown the euro back into crisis.

Economists like Anat Admati would rather have the percentage of equity determine a bank’s ability to withstand stress.

How DId the Bank Pass the Stress Test with So LIttle Cash?

How DId the Bank Pass the Stress Test with So LIttle Cash?

 

Ukraine Election Legitimate?

Paul Roderick Gregory writes:   Ukrainians elected a new parliament – the Verkhovna Rada — its 450-seat single-house legislative body. As a consequence of the Euromaidan revolution and Russia’s war on southeastern Ukraine, the parliamentary election was moved up from 2017 to October 2014.

Most signs point to a legitimate election, which will surely be confirmed by an official report of OSCE observers.

The early parliamentary election was necessary to give Ukraine’s representative democracy a chance to reflect Ukraine’s new pro-Western orientation, as emphasized by George Soros, and to respond to the challenges of occupied territory, Russian troops in the country, gas delivery disputes, and continued or expanded aggression from the Russian side. Despite defections from Viktor Yanukovich’s Party of the Regions after his flight from Ukraine, Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko had faced a strong bloc of deputies opposed to reform and against a strong response to Russia’s aggression.

Poroshenko got what he needed. His own bloc and that of Prime Minister Yatsenyuk received 44 percent of the votes. A surprisingly strong showing of the “Self Help” party headed by the pro-Western mayor of Lviv gives him a coalition of 57 percent of the votes – a governing majority in which all members share common policies towards the West and Russia.

Importantly, Poroshenko does not need the two “radical” parties on the ballot in his ruling coalition, which together garnered 12 percent of the vote. Both, however, will enter parliament, and will hold the ruling majority’s feet to the fire if they show weakness towards Russia. The Opposition Party, comprised of deputies from the southeastern provinces, gained only 8 percent of the vote, and former political heavyweight Yulia Tymoshenko’s party got only 6 percent, despite having a war heroine as its figurehead. Voters are telling Tymoshenko that she had her chance and failed.

For the first time in its history, the communist party failed to reach the 5 percent threshold.

Russian propaganda had been gearing up for a stronger showing of the two “radical” parties, which would have admitted one or both to the ruling coalition. Putin’s trolls were ready to scream that neo-Nazis and racial extremists control the Kiev government, but such charges will fall on deaf ears for those who know the true election outcome.

In fact, earlier public opinion polls showed the “Radical Party” headed by Oleh Liashko coming in second place. It is easy to understand his popularity. Liashko organized volunteer battalions and himself participated in the Anti-Terrorist operation in eastern Ukraine. For many Ukrainians, Liashko is the equivalent of the Minutemen of the American Revolution, but when it came time to vote, Ukrainians voted for mainstream parties. Perhaps they understood the propaganda coup for Russia of a Liashko in the ruling coalition.

Already, Western pundits are complaining that the election of a pro-Western parliament will endanger crisis resolution. A Time Magazine correspondent complains that as a result of leaving pro-Russian voters out of the election (their self-appointed leaders chose to boycott), the election will not heal the divide.

We are still awaiting Putin’s reaction. He must make the tough decision whether to recognize the election results – and admit the legitimacy of Ukraine as a sovereign state – or continue his ploy that the government of Ukraine is illegitimate.

Ukraine Elections

 

Rouseff Edges Out a Victory in Brazil

Rouseff is victor in the Brazilian election, but in an almost evenly split vote.  In the past three decades, one three incumbents in Latin American countries have lost.  Rouseff provided generous support to the poor of her country.  In turn, poor areas in the north and northeast of the country voted overwhelmingly for her.  On her watch, unemplyment has been low, wages on the rise and the inequality gap closed somewhat.

Rouseff has been mired in an investigation into bribes by Petrobras, the state-controlled oil giant.  A Congress of 28 parties up from 22 will be unwieldy to manage.  The Petrobras scandal will not go away.  And high inflation and lack of competitiveness will hound Rouseff.  Protests of 2013 against political corruption may rise again.

Rouseff

Ukraine Tries for Transparency

Even in the best of times, governments have a difficult time cleaning up.  In Ukraine, where the economy is contracting, they are trying to get rid of negative sterotypes.

It is reported that one out of three people in the country have been asked to pay bribees.  Elections this month will probably reflect the pubic’s desire to end corruption.  Ukraine wants to set itself apart from Russia.  It needs to attract foreign investment and counter an economic decline.  It won’t receive $27 bilion in finanical aid or meet requirements for the European Union membership unless it starts to curb graft.

Ukraine

Should Human Reproduction Be Commercialized?

After the frist surrogate deivery in India in 1994, India has become an international destination for surrogate birth.  Has India exploited women as baby producers?

Loosely draftd agreements with commissioning parents leave surropate mothers vulnerable.  What is parents decide against taking the child?  And from the parents point of view, are they guaranteed delivery of ths child by the surrogate?   These quesitons are seldom answered definitively in legal agreements.

The larger moral question about whether human reproduction should be commerdaized remains.

SUrrogate Parenthood

Alex Blumberg’s StartUp

In a new podcast, Blumberg describes how to start s business.  While there is nothing new under this sun, it may be comforting to know, if you’re embarking on your own busiiness that everyone has the same problems and that these probllems can be overcome.

Each episode as a business is built from scratch feels intimate and honest. He records his humiliating failed pitches to millionaire cpaptialists and explains how he improves his pitch for the next time.  Available on iTunes.

Startups

No Shortcuts to European Recovery?

There is a growing consensus that austerity is contributing to the Eurozone’s macroeconomic malaise, but also that spending cuts are needed in the long run to achieve fiscal sustainability. Some commentators have advocated a temporary tax cut financed by unsterilised ECB purchases of long-term public debt, accompanied by a commitment to future spending cuts. This article argues that such commitments are simply not credible – especially given the moral hazard problem created by central bank monetisation of debts. No Shortcuts to European Recovery

No Shortcuts?